 | | |
Sidestep passesFewer and fewer
sidesteps, some say the sidestep passes into history and may become
extinct. Not true! The sidestep lives!
The
articleOn November 7th 1999 The Independent - London
published an article by Andrew Longmore. The title was...
Rugby Union:The sidestep passes into history
Andrew Longmore examines why one of the game's glories is a fading
memory.
I
agree with much of the article, fewer and fewer sidesteps were being
seen and there was the possibility they would become extinct.
However,
I must disagree with Andrew's suggestion of an inherent weakness in the
technique, the idea that sidesteps at pace are in the genes and that
sidesteps are not possible with modern defence.
Sidestep
- inherent weakness in technique?Andrew
Longmore appears to suggest a
reason why the sidestep passes into history.
He explains that sidesteppers are vulnerable because the technique entails, in effect, briefly becoming almost stationary.
This may be true about the jink,
but certainly not the sidestep done expertly at pace.
In fact, the opposite is true. A sidestep done at pace involves re-directing a great deal of kinetic energy. Any player colliding unexpectedly with a player sidestepping at pace may well come off second best.
Don't just take
my word for the speed....
Gareth
Edwards in his book "GARETH An Autobiography", 1978, page 158,
tells a lovely
story about Gerald Davies
- read the book.
They were playing against
each other. Edwards says he knew that Davies was able to change direction by almost ninety degrees and felt sure he had Davies covered.
What Edwards didn't know at the time - and so he was left empty handed, was that Davies could do it at top speed!
Sidestep
at pace - in the genes?The article includes a quote from Ian McGeechan "You
can teach players to sidestep, but to do it at pace, that's in the genes".
No.
It's poor teaching
methods and not enough practice!
People can be taught
to change body position in mid-air (diving, trampolining, gymnastics)
and on the ground (gymnastics).
Footballers who
embrace Brazillian techniques persuade opponents you are going one way, then go
another.
Even if it was in the genes,
where is the current batch of sidesteppers with the genes!
It's about desire!
It's no coincidence you see an
expert sidestepper, imagine you can do it and then it's true! Remember this!!!
Sidestep
passes - modern defenceEverything goes in cycles - it's been
defence for quite a while.
Of those (millions, I
imagine) touched by David
Watkins, I was one. I saw what he did and was inspired - I wanted to do it as well.
Another
was Phil Larder - he had
to face the sidestepping wizard! In a document
"defence_all.doc" at "http://rugbycoach.homestead.com" (I found it by
Googling "phil larder cope david watkins") I found some details about Larder.
Unable to contain Watkins, Larder evolved a type of zone defence, involving three players watching the ball-carrier. He went on to use it in coaching defence at the highest level.
Defence has been the focus for a long time.
Concentrate instead on
attacking play and sidestepping ability and most players in a team could
dramatically change direction at will.
There is always broken play. ANY observant person will see sidestepping opportunities
in EVERY game.
Would
the defence hold?
They'd certainly have more
problems than now!
It's time for the next part of
the cycle - ATTACK!
Return
from Sidestep passes to History of rugby

|
|